The Emerging Tax Landscape of Prediction Markets

Prediction markets have experienced rapid growth over the last several years. They are drawing in investors, cryptocurrency enthusiasts, and high-net-worth individuals who want to participate in financial markets through alternative avenues. Platforms like Kalshi have introduced a different style of trading where participants buy and sell contracts based on the probability of future events.

While public attention usually focuses on the mechanics of these platforms, a more pressing issue is surfacing: the tax implications of these trades.

Recent legislative moves in North Carolina show that state governments are actively shaping tax frameworks specifically for prediction markets. Although this new law targets operators rather than individual traders, it indicates a broader trend. Federal and state regulators are increasingly treating prediction markets as permanent fixtures of the financial landscape, which means tax compliance and reporting expectations will continue to evolve.

If you actively trade prediction contracts, it is time to focus on how these transactions impact your tax position.

Understanding Prediction Markets and How They Operate

Prediction markets allow participants to trade contracts tied to the outcomes of future occurrences. Rather than purchasing corporate stock or mutual funds, traders buy contracts that fluctuate in value based on whether a specific event happens.

Typical contracts center on economic and political events, such as:

  • Will the Federal Reserve raise interest rates this year?
  • Will inflation exceed a certain percentage?
  • Will Congress pass a specific piece of legislation?
  • Will a specific economic indicator reach a stated level?

While these platforms might superficially resemble sports betting, a major legal distinction separates them.

Many prediction market platforms operate under the oversight of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), the federal agency that regulates U.S. derivatives markets. Rather than categorizing these platforms as sportsbooks, the CFTC regulates certain event contracts as financial products. This regulatory distinction carries significant weight for taxpayers and advisors alike.

The Impact of North Carolina's New Tax Legislation

North Carolina recently passed legislation creating a 6% tax on the net trading fee revenue earned by prediction-market operators within the state. This same piece of legislation also raised the state's sports wagering tax.

The significance of this law goes beyond the introduction of a new tax.

Specifically, North Carolina chose to recognize federally regulated prediction-market platforms as distinct entities from sports wagering. Instead of grouping these markets under traditional gambling, the state acknowledged the federal regulatory structure set by the CFTC.

For individual investors, this legislation does not impose a new state-level tax on your personal trading activity. Instead, it signals that lawmakers are starting to establish tax rules specifically around prediction markets as their own asset class. This is an important transition because once governments begin crafting industry-specific rules, additional tax guidance typically follows.

Financial advisor analyzing market trends

The Federal Regulatory Picture Is Taking Shape

The federal government is also taking a clearer stance on these platforms. The CFTC has consistently maintained that federally regulated event-contract markets fall under its authority, rather than under state-level gambling regulations. The agency has defended this position in recent litigation involving state attempts to regulate prediction-market activity.

While these legal disputes primarily impact the platform operators, they demonstrate that prediction markets are becoming a recognized part of the U.S. financial system. As this recognition solidifies, we expect more formal tax guidance and reporting expectations to follow.

The Core Question: How Are Prediction Market Winnings Taxed?

The primary challenge for investors is that the IRS has not yet issued comprehensive guidance addressing the tax treatment of prediction market transactions. Consequently, tax professionals must analyze several potential approaches under current tax law.

Option 1: Treating Winnings as Gambling Income

One approach is to categorize prediction market gains as gambling income. Under this treatment, net winnings are taxed as ordinary income at your marginal tax rate. Gambling losses are generally only deductible to offset gambling winnings if you itemize deductions. Furthermore, current rules limit the deduction for gambling losses to 90% of those losses. This limitation could theoretically create taxable income even if you economically broke even for the year.

Option 2: Treating Winnings as Capital Assets

Another option is to treat prediction market contracts as capital assets. Under this framework, gains and losses are reported similarly to standard property transactions, with individual trades detailed on Form 8949. Net capital losses can offset capital gains, and up to $3,000 of ordinary income per year.

Option 3: Section 1256 Treatment

A third possibility applies to specific contracts traded on CFTC-designated contract markets. Depending on the contract details and tax regulations, certain transactions might qualify for Section 1256 treatment. This would offer a favorable tax split of 60% long-term and 40% short-term capital gains, regardless of how long you held the contract.

Because the IRS has not yet provided definitive guidance, there is no single answer that applies to every prediction market transaction.

Why a Conservative Tax Reporting Strategy Makes Sense

Without clear directives from the IRS, many tax professionals recommend taking a conservative reporting position.

Treating prediction market gains as ordinary income is typically the most audit-resistant path because it applies the least favorable tax treatment. While this might lead to paying more tax than eventually required, it reduces the risk that the IRS will accuse you of underreporting your income. This approach also helps shield you from accuracy-related penalties if the IRS later establishes a stricter interpretation.

Importantly, if the IRS later issues formal, more favorable guidance, you may have the opportunity to amend your previously filed returns. Generally, taxpayers have three years from the filing date, or two years from the date the tax was paid (whichever is later), to claim a refund via an amended return. For many investors, paying a bit more today is preferable to facing back taxes, interest, and penalties later.

Tax document preparation on computer

Key Tax Questions for Prediction Market Investors

Whenever a new investment product gains traction, tax complexities inevitably follow. Prediction markets are no exception. Investors should ask themselves:

  • How should my gains and losses be reported?
  • Which tax treatment fits my specific transactions?
  • Will reporting requirements change in the near future?
  • What records do I need to keep?
  • Will my trading platforms report information directly to the IRS?
  • How will my state treat these transactions?

These are not questions to leave for tax season. They are planning questions that should be discussed proactively with your advisor.

Lessons From the Evolution of Cryptocurrency Taxation

Investors who navigated the rise of cryptocurrency will recognize this pattern. In the early days of crypto, tax guidance was scarce, and many assumed the IRS would not pay much attention to digital assets. Over time, however, the IRS heavily ramped up enforcement, created new disclosure forms, and expanded information reporting requirements.

While prediction markets are not cryptocurrency and may not be regulated in the exact same manner, they share a critical similarity: both are fast-growing financial products that outpaced the tax rules surrounding them. As these markets expand, we expect to see additional IRS guidance, new state-level rules, and expanded reporting requirements.

The Critical Importance of Good Recordkeeping

Regardless of how the regulatory framework evolves, maintaining meticulous records is your best defense. If you trade prediction contracts, ensure you retain:

  • Trade confirmations
  • Purchase and settlement dates
  • Contract values
  • Trading fees
  • Account statements
  • Annual tax reporting documents

Having organized files simplifies tax preparation and allows us to report your transactions correctly while seeking planning opportunities. It also provides essential support if your return is questioned later.

More States Are Likely to Develop Tax Rules

North Carolina is unlikely to remain the only state addressing prediction markets. As these platforms grow, more states will review how to tax operators and how prediction-market activity fits into their existing tax structures. Some states may follow North Carolina's lead by taxing operators directly, while others may implement more aggressive regulations or wait for the federal government to establish clearer guidelines.

No matter which paths they choose, the trend is clear: prediction markets are entering the financial mainstream, and tax policy is catching up.

Why Pre-Year-End Planning Pays Off

Waiting until after the tax year ends to think about taxes is a common mistake that limits your options. If you trade prediction market contracts, your reporting choices can significantly affect your tax liability. With the IRS still silent on definitive rules, selecting a reasonable, documented reporting position is highly important.

A proactive review of your trading activity before filing allows us to identify potential reporting challenges, evaluate the most appropriate treatment under current law, and prepare for any future IRS changes.

Navigating Changing Rules with Christiansen Accounting

Prediction markets are transitioning from a niche trading activity to a recognized, regulated financial landscape. North Carolina's recent laws prove that state governments are working to integrate these platforms into their tax codes. In the absence of a final IRS ruling, investors must make careful, informed decisions based on existing laws.

At Christiansen Accounting, we help clients navigate these emerging tax challenges. Contact us today to review your prediction market activity and build a proactive tax strategy for this evolving landscape.

Share this article...

Want tax & accounting tips and insights?

Sign up for our newsletter.

I confirm this is a service inquiry and not an advertising message or solicitation. By clicking “Submit”, I acknowledge and agree to the creation of an account and to the and .